Appendix talk:Arora surnames

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Appendix talk:Arora surnames. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Appendix talk:Arora surnames, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Appendix talk:Arora surnames in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Appendix talk:Arora surnames you have here. The definition of the word Appendix talk:Arora surnames will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofAppendix talk:Arora surnames, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFD discussion: November–December 2021

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Indian Surname Appendices

·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 16:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Inqilābī Does this deletion request extend to other appendices in Category:Surname appendices such as Appendix:Indian surnames (Arora) and:
Appendix:Indian surnames
Appendix:Indian surnames (Billava)
Appendix:Indian surnames (Bunt)
Appendix:Indian surnames (Chitpavan)
Appendix:Indian surnames (Deshastha Brahmin)
Appendix:Indian surnames (Goan Christian)
Appendix:Indian surnames (Paravar)
Appendix:Indian surnames (Shivalli)
?
Appendix_talk:Indian_surnames_(Arora)#Deletion_debate was RFD kept in 2010.
Appendix talk:Indian surnames (Deshastha Brahmin) failed RFD in 2012 - 2013 but was apparently restored.
Kutchkutch (talk) 14:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Kutchkutch: Oh, I did not know there are so many of these. I think these appendices are unnecessary, and the only thing that we should be creating is new dictionary entries for surnames (and given names). A list of surnames (not in category form) would hardly help us in creating new entries, because the editors working in a particular language would already be knowing what surnames to create. Furthermore, dividing this list by literally caste seems unproductive, as we do not mention caste (or religion) in our entries. Finally, we do not know if the spellings or the names in these lists are reliable, and some people may even be relying on them to create new entries. Thus, these appendices are useless that we should get rid of, since they serve no purpose. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 17:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply