Appendix talk:Roget's thesaurus classification

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Appendix talk:Roget's thesaurus classification. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Appendix talk:Roget's thesaurus classification, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Appendix talk:Roget's thesaurus classification in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Appendix talk:Roget's thesaurus classification you have here. The definition of the word Appendix talk:Roget's thesaurus classification will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofAppendix talk:Roget's thesaurus classification, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Various

This should be linking to Wiktionary Category pages once we get them going... Brettz9 07:01, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Online versions

Linking to online version

I have used newly created template {{ws roget}} to link to an online version, as of now only from one section, in the hope of adding value to the current tree. The appearance of the template can be finetuned. The template can be extended to link to Wikisaurus when it has an entry, reusing the code from {{ws}}. --Dan Polansky 15:56, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Moby links no longer work; it appears the destination domain now has a new owner who is no longer providing the expected data.

Numeration/Indentation =

I find the numbering of sections to be inconsistent with the indentation, but I'm not clear on which is "wrong". Some may regard this as a minor issue, but I find it makes the first impression of the page confusing.

I suspect that this is a case of several people editing different areas, each with a different preferred style. If so then all that's needed is for someone to take a pass through, coercing all to a single style. I'm tempted to do so, but for the annoying possibility that there is already a single style that I'm too dense to recognize.

If the latter, perhaps some kind soul will make a change to the layout, improving the readability to make this "one true style" more evident to the meanest understanding. Wcoole 17:48, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply