Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Category talk:Dragons. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Category talk:Dragons, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Category talk:Dragons in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Category talk:Dragons you have here. The definition of the word Category talk:Dragons will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofCategory talk:Dragons, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
I don't use the categories much, but I don't see the advantage in dumping 23 more entries into an already full Mythological creatures. Splitting out groups of 20 for subcategorization is usually a good thing in my experience from other Wikis.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I agree with the principle of splitting out scores of entries into subcategories, but perhaps a more general category for aquatic mythological creatures would be preferable, which could also encompass naiads and nixies and kelpies and kappas and so forth. ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 18:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Abstain. Looking at Category:en:Dragons, it now has 16 entries while its immediately larger broader category Category:en:Mythological creatures has 127 entries. Looking at Category:en:Leprosy, it now has 15 entries. I deemed Leprosy too specific or granular and Diseases the appropriate granularity but I was outvoted in Category talk:en:Leprosy. As for granularity, the relationship dragons :: mythological creatures seems very much like leprosy :: diseases. Category:en:Merpeople has 33 entries. I would vote delete but I do not want to go against a broad trend of keeping highly granular category if there is such a trend; the leprosy discussion suggests there is such a trend. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:52, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Abstain. Conceptually, these seem too specific... and yet the "mer" category has 33 entries in it, and the "mer- prefix" category has enough more to bring the total to almost 50 entries. It seems tolerable, though not necessary, to split 50 entries off from a broader ~150-entry category. - -sche(discuss)03:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Closed as no consensus to delete: This thing has been open for almost two years. There's two votes for abstain, a soft keep by Prosfilaes, and the nomination to delete it. There's been enough time for additional people to come forward to support deletion, but none have. Purplebackpack8919:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
