Category talk:Pronunciations wildly different across the pond

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Category talk:Pronunciations wildly different across the pond. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Category talk:Pronunciations wildly different across the pond, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Category talk:Pronunciations wildly different across the pond in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Category talk:Pronunciations wildly different across the pond you have here. The definition of the word Category talk:Pronunciations wildly different across the pond will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofCategory talk:Pronunciations wildly different across the pond, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

"English xenophones" maybe? I can't think of a term that describes this phenomenon (allophone and heterophone are certainly wrong). --EncycloPetey 05:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Suggest this

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  • How about Pronunciations differing between Template:W2 and Template:W2. Ha! How parochial. Why break tools like that one? NIMBY syndrome?
Thus try, 'Pronunciations differing between w:Commonwealth English and w:North American English' and you type the pipetricks. Regards, // FrankB 23:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Deletion debate

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

Category:Pronunciations wildly different across the pond

Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I'd have deleted this on sight, but for two reasons. 1) It says 'placeholder category for...' and 2) MglovesfunBot is busy right now to orphan it. Seems like an experiment from 2006 that is not only no longer relevant, it's bad. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:40, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

No commenters? Mglovesfun (talk) 20:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

{{look}}

Ooh, go ahead and delete this. It might qualify for an appendix, at most, but definitely not a category! -- Liliana • 17:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Weak delete as very ill-defined slash subjective; otherwise move (terrible name).​—msh210℠ (talk) 19:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Deleted, contents kept at Appendix:English words with pronunciations wildly different across the pond (feel free to move that page). - -sche (discuss) 19:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply


Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia