Category talk:Templates
The word templates is over used and abused and has many meanings in Wiktionary. So please, some defintion of what this ] is about--Richardb 01:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- AFAIK, this should be the top-level category of all templates (which should, theoretically, all be categorized somewhere). — Vildricianus 09:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
I rearranged this category a bit. Wiktionary:Entry layout explained is quite good, but we all know that templates lists are always outdated, so I went to this category and I found it completely useless. Hopefully, now (since «templates should, theoretically, all be categorized») it won't took an hour and a half to find a template like {{figuratively}}, which I was looking for and isn't linked by any help page or list. :-)
It's also useful to find some dups... --Nemo bis 10:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
RFC discussion: May 2006–September 2007
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Can someone please put in what this category is about ?
- It seems to be an organizing category for (all?) templates in use on Wiktionary. It does seem to have all the Latin templates. --EncycloPetey 08:26, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Move to WT:RFD? --Connel MacKenzie 16:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Seems well organized on the whole, and useful. Struck. DAVilla 14:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)