Citations:Atticism

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Citations:Atticism. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Citations:Atticism, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Citations:Atticism in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Citations:Atticism you have here. The definition of the word Citations:Atticism will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofCitations:Atticism, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

〃, Lib. 4. (⸿ 133, ¶ 1), page 286:

The ſame Summer, the Thebans demoliſhed the walles of the Theſpians, laying Atticiſme to their charge.

en dè tôi autôi thérei Thēbaîoi Thespiôn teîkhos perieîlon epikalésantes attikismón,…

— Thucydides’ Greek from η Βικιθήκη – the Greek Wikisource

〃, Lib. 8. (⸿ 38, ¶ 3), pages 489–490:

And the Chians, as hauing beene diſheartned in diuers former Battels, and otherwiſe, not onely, not mutually well affected, but iealous one of another, (for Tydeus and his Complices, had bin put to death by Pædaritus for Atticiſme, and the reſt of the City was kept in awe, but by force, and for a time) ſtirred not againſt them.

hoi dè Khîoi en pollaîs taîs prìn mákhais peplēgménoi, kaì állōs en sphísin autoîs ou pánu eû diakeímenoi, allà kaì tôn metà Tudéōs toû Íōnos ḗdē hupò Pedarítou ep’ attikismôi tethneṓtōn kaì tês állēs póleōs kat’ anánkēn es olígous katekhoménēs hupóptōs diakeímenoi allḗlois hēsúkhazon, kaì oút’ autoì dià taûta oúth’ hoi metà Pedarítou epíkouroi axiómakhoi autoîs ephaínonto.

— Thucydides’ Greek from η Βικιθήκη – the Greek Wikisource

1642 April, John Milton, An Apology Againſt a Pamphlet Call’d A Modeſt Confutation of the Animadverſions upon the Remonſtrant againſt Smectymnuus., London: Iohn Rothwell, page 14:

There while they acted, and overacted, among other young ſcholars, I was a ſpectator; they thought themſelves gallant men, and I thought them fools, they made ſport, and I laught, they miſpronounc’t and I miſlik’t, and to make up the atticiſme, they were out, and I hiſt.

1792, William Newcome, An Hiſtorical View of the Engliſh Biblical Tranſlations: The Expediency of Reviſing by Authority our Preſent Tranſlation: And the Means of Executing Such a Reviſion., Dublin: John Exshaw, Chap. V.: Rules for conducting an improved verſion of the bible, Rule II., page 279:

There is an elegant Atticiſm which occurs Luke xiii. 9. “If it bear fruit, well.” We find this figure of ſpeech in the Chaldee, Dan. iii. 15; and, I think, in the Hebrew, Exod. xxxii. 32: “Yet now, if thou wilt forgive their ſin, well.”

〃, Rule XII., page 335:

Much force will be added to a verſion of the bible by retaining thoſe Hebraiſms which the Engliſh language eaſily admits, or to which an Engliſh ear is now accuſtomed. Of this kind are, Enoch walked with God; though ſhe fortify the height of her ſtrength; the throne of his glory; labour of love; as for Ephraim, their glory ſhall flee away as a bird: which laſt form reſembles Salluſt’s plebs urbana ea vero præceps ierat; and that common Atticiſm, urbem quam ſtatuo, veſtra eſt.

1813 May 9th (Sunday), authorship uncertain, but probably Leigh Hunt or Thomas Barnes, “Theatrical Examiner, No. 137.”, in The Examiner, number 280, page 298/1:

When we say one word against Catalani, may we never hear her sing again. Her extatic warblings overwhelm reason with delight; criticism is content to wonder without referring to its rules of analysis; and her mistakes, if she makes any, are perceptible only to the musical pedant who thinks a deviation from a scientific canon ill compensated by the most fanciful beauties of execution. Such a man would accuse Thucydides of false grammar on account of his atticisms, or Homer of incorrect quantity for the occasional artful protraction of a short syllable.

1837, Connop Thirlwall, A History of Greece, volume IV (volume LXXXVIII of The Cabinet Cyclopædia, conducted by the Rev. Dionysius Lardner), London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longman, Paternoster-Row · John Taylor, Upper Gower Street, Chap. xxxi: From the end of the Peloponnesian War to the re-establishment of democracy at Athens., § 7: “Theramenes in Opposition”, page 188:

When the disasters of the Athenians in Sicily had ruined their interest in all the Italiot cities, Lysias and his brother were compelled to quit Thurii on the charge of Atticism (of taking the Athenian side in political questions) and they returned to Athens, which was then under the government of the Four Hundred, and continued to reside there to the time which out narrative has now reached.

1908, Karl Gustav Dieterich, “Byzantine Literature” (pages 113–124), in Charles George Herbermann, editor, The Catholic Encyclopedia: An International Work of Reference on the Constitution, Doctrine, Discipline, and History of the Catholic Church, Special Edition under the auspices of the Knights of Columbus Catholic Truth Committee, volume III: Brow–Clancy, New York: Robert Appleton Company · The Encyclopedia Press, Inc., published 1913, page 113/2:

It looks towards Athens as well as towards Jerusalem. Herein lies the germ of the intellectual dualism which thoroughly permeates the Byzantine and partly also the modern Greek civilization, the dualism between the culture of scholars and that of the people. Even the literature of the Hellenistic age suffers from this dualism; we distinguish in it two tendencies, one rationalistic and scholarly, the other romantic and popular. The former originated in the schools of the Alexandrian sophists and culminated in the rhetorical romance, its chief representatives being Lucian, Achilles Tatius, Heliodorus, and Longus, the latter had its root in the idyllic tendency of Theocritus, and culminated in the idyllic novel of Callimachus, Musæus, Quintus of Smyrna, and others. Both tendencies persisted in Byzantium, but the first, as the one officially recognized, retained predominance and was not driven from the field until the fall of the empire. The first tendency, strong as it was, received additional support from the reactionary linguistic movement known as Atticism. Represented at its height by rhetoricians like Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and grammarians like Herodian and Phrynicus at Alexandria, this tendency prevailed from the second century B. C. onward, and with the force of an ecclesiastical dogma controlled all subsequent Greek culture, so that the living form of the Greek language, even then being transformed into modern Greek, was quite obscured and only occasionally found expression, chiefly in private documents, though also in popular literature.

1922, Emily Wilmer Cave Wright, Philostratus and Eunapius: The Lives of the Sophists, London · New York: William Heinemann · G. P. Putnam’s Sons, Philostratus — Introduction, page xix:

There are two rival tendencies in the oratory of the second and third centuries, Asianism and Atticism. The Asianic style is flowery, bombastic, full of startling metaphors, too metrical, too dependent on the tricks of rhetoric, too emotional. In short, the Asianic declaimer aims at but never achieves the grand style. The Atticist usually imitates some classical author, aims at simplicity of style, and is a purist, carefully avoiding any allusion or word that does not occur in a writer of the classical period.

〃, page xxxvi:

Aelius Aristeides, surnamed Theodorus, was born in Mysia, in 117. According to Suidas, he studied under Polemo, but no doubt he owed more to the teaching of Herodes. He is the chief representative of the religious and literary activity of the sophists and their revival of Atticism in the second century, and we must judge of that revival mainly from his works which are in great part extant.

1994 April, Jakob Wisse, “Greeks, Romans, and the Rise of Atticism” (chapter 4), in Jelle Gert-Jan Abbenes, Simon Roelof Slings, Ineke Sluiter, editors, Greek Literary Theory After Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D.M. Schenkeveld, Amsterdam: VU University Press, published 1995, pages 65–82

2010 March 12th, Lawrence Kim, “The Literary Heritage as Language: Atticism and the Second Sophistic” (chapter 31), in Egbert Jan Bakker, editor, A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language (Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World), Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., →DOI, →ISBN, →LCCN, Part Five: Greek as Literature, pages 468–482

2011 February 17th, Philomen Probert, “Attic Irregularities: Their Reinterpretation in the Light of Atticism” (chapter 15, pages 269–290), in Στέφανος Ματθαίος , Franco Montanari, Αντώνιος Ρεγκάκος , editors, Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts (Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volumes; 8), Berlin · New York: De Gruyter, →DOI, →ISBN, →ISSN, →LCCN, part III. «The Ancient Grammarians on the Greek Language and Linguistic Correctness», § 1. Introduction, page 269, footnote 1:

Much of the literature on the origins of Atticism is concerned with possible historical connections between linguistic Atticism and the earlier rise of ‘Atticism’ in both Latin and Greek rhetorical style. This paper is concerned only with linguistic Atticism; it leaves aside entirely the vexed question of connections between linguistic and rhetorical Atticism.

2015 May 1st, Neil O’Sullivan, “‘Rhetorical’ vs ‘linguistic’ Atticism: a false dichotomy?” (pages 134–146), in Marc Gerard Marie van der Poel, editor, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, volume XXXIII, number 2, Oakland: University of California Press, →DOI, →ISSN, →JSTOR, Abstract, page 134:

Modern students of Atticism, the movement which looked to Athenian literature of the classical age to provide models for later composition, often draw a distinction between what they call “rhetorical” (or “stylistic”) Atticism of the first century BCE and a supposedly later phenomenon termed “linguistic” (or “grammatical”) Atticism. This paper questions this dichotomy by showing the clearly linguistic interests of some significant first century BCE Greek and Roman Atticists—Caecilius of Calacte, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and T. Annius Cimber—and by arguing that they demonstrate that an interest in antiquarian diction and morphology is part of Atticism from its beginnings.

2016, Ελένη Μπόζια , “Atticism: The Language of 5th-century Oratory or a Quantifiable Stylistic Phenomenon?” (pages 557–571), in Giuseppe Giovanni Antonio Celano, Gregory Crane, editors, Open Linguistics, volume 2, special issue on Treebanking and Ancient Languages: Current and Prospective Research, Berlin: De Gruyter Open Access, published the 30th of December in 2016, →DOI, →ISSN, § 1: «Introduction», page 557:

5^th- and 4^th-century BCE orators, Lysias, Isocrates, Demosthenes, are the par excellence representatives of Attic oratory and paragons of Atticism due to their proper usage of Attic forms and expressions. Asiatic oratory ensues along with a general decadence in rhetorical productions that has been credited to the influx of eastern elements until Atticism is revived in Imperial times. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, the 1^st-century BCE teacher of rhetoric, attributes this literary upward shift to the Romans – either that means a re-appreciation of Greek eloquence or implies a political vindictiveness that expresses itself through language and literature on behalf of the Roman subjects against their rulers. The fact remains, though, that there is an overwhelming production of grammar books and lexica focusing on Atticism, all the while determining Greekness as well. Additionally, Cicero and Quintilian express their esteem of Atticism and instruct Roman orators on how to achieve it. This acknowledgment alone is enough to put forward not only an issue of political standing of Greek language and literature, but also to contend that Atticism filtered through centuries and literary genres was modulated into a stylistic construction that transcends language. Cleanness of expressions, comprehensiveness, cohesiveness and other structural attributes alongside linguistic appropriateness in the language that is used in each case bear the tag of “Atticism.”

2020 August 27th , Lawrence Kim, “Asianism and Atticism”, in Oxford Classical Dictionary, digital edition, →DOI, Summary:

Asianism is a modern coinage referring to the rhetorical practice of certain Greek and Latin orators whose styles were designated by ancient critics as Asian (Asianus, Asiaticus, Ἀσιανός) — the “Asia” in question being the Republican Roman province. Asian eloquence was often contrasted unfavorably to a corresponding Attic style (Atticus, Ἀττικός), which was modelled on the prose of classical Athenian writers (a practice now known as Atticism). This opposition between Asian and Attic styles is first attested in Roman oratorical circles during the mid-1st century BCE and was subsequently adopted by Greek critics in Augustan Rome, but seems to have fallen out of fashion by the reign of Tiberius. While Attic remains a general stylistic ideal in the more broadly conceived classicism of Imperial Greek literature, the term Asian disappears as a stylistic label. In a related, but separate development, from the late 1st century CE onwards, Greek literary writers increasingly adhered to a linguistic, rather than stylistic, variety of Atticism, which concentrated on reproducing the ancient Attic dialect used by Athenian authors of the 5th and 4th centuries BCE. This Atticism was opposed, not to anything Asian, but to the literary koinê of the Hellenistic and early Imperial era.

2021 January 21st, Chiara Monaco, The Origins and Development of Linguistic Atticism‎ (doctoral thesis), Cambridge: University of Cambridge, →DOI, Abstract:

My thesis entitled ‘The Origins and Development of Linguistic Atticism’ deals with the linguistic debate around the idea of ‘correct Greek’, and especially with the origins and the development of a movement known as Atticism, which promoted the Attic of the fifth century BCE as the correct language through the means of lexica.