Citations:Eevolution

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Citations:Eevolution. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Citations:Eevolution, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Citations:Eevolution in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Citations:Eevolution you have here. The definition of the word Citations:Eevolution will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofCitations:Eevolution, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

English citations of Eevolution and eevolution

Noun: any Pokémon that is a next evolutionary stage of Eevee

1999 2000 2001
ME « 15th c. 16th c. 17th c. 18th c. 19th c. 20th c. 21st c.
  • 1999 April 19, PxSx25h <[email protected]>, “Cheap Pokemon”, in alt.games.nintendo.pokemon‎ (Usenet), message-ID <[email protected]>:
    Why do people think that the Legendary Birds and Eevolutions (provided they are only using one or traded for the other one legitimately) are cheap? I agree Mewtwo is sorta cheap because it is a psychic and its stats are way jacked up. But hell, my Jolteon could take out Articuno, Moltres, and maybe Zapdos (does the flying aspect make it vulnerable to electric?). Obtaining Pokemon in a legit fashion does not make them cheap. I see posts where if a person uses an Eevolution or Legendary Birds, they are considered cheap.
  • 1999 April 26, Dryad48 <[email protected]>, “Re: Cheap Pokémon? Why?”, in alt.games.nintendo.pokemon‎ (Usenet), message-ID <[email protected]>:
    Well, many people think a pokemon that can fight better than many others is cheap. The ONLY, and let me repeat that. The ONLY cheap ones are the ones with no weaknesses. Alakazam isn't cheap because of its failing defense. the Eevolutions are not cheap; they have many weaknesses.
  • 1999 July 8, Ixbalam <[email protected]>, “Re: Pokèmon Pinball: Eevee?”, in alt.games.nintendo.pokemon‎ (Usenet), message-ID <[email protected]>:
    Nope. The stones that come up are random. You just have to keep catching Eevees until you get all three eevolutions. It took me a while to get anything but a Vaporeon in the silly game .
  • 2000 December 19, Juan F. Lara <[email protected]>, “Re: Eevee evolution?????????????????????????????”, in alt.games.nintendo.pokemon‎ (Usenet), message-ID <[email protected]>:
    Along the way I levelled the Eevee I got from Bill only to Level 25. So I bred a new Eevee using her ( I want this Eevee to stay an Eevee while her offspring become eevolutions ) and she needed only one level to lay an egg.
  • 2001 August 1, Jolly Trolly <[email protected]>, “Re: who?”, in alt.games.nintendo.pokemon‎ (Usenet), message-ID <[email protected]>:
    On Azure Heights a guy posted there with the name Chloreon, a grass eevolution. That's about the best made-up name I've seen.
  • 2001 August 3, Ingo Kemper <[email protected]>, “Re: who?”, in alt.games.nintendo.pokemon‎ (Usenet), message-ID <[email protected]>:
    Venomeon, a Poison eevolution. Pebblix, a baby Onix prestage. Farflung, a fight/flight Farfetch'd evolution.
  • 2001 August 4, Ingo Kemper <[email protected]>, “Re: who's next”, in alt.games.nintendo.pokemon‎ (Usenet), message-ID <[email protected]>:
    Somewhere on the web I've seen a "Freezeon". It looked like a crossbreed of Vaporeon and Porygon, but for some reason it didn't seem to fit into the ranks of eevolutions.
  • 2001 July 22, Talen <[email protected]>, “Re: Clear Horizons v4.3”, in alt.games.nintendo.pokemon‎ (Usenet), message-ID <[email protected]>:
    You're using a 'wak with the 'club. You're using a vaguely modified curselax that I've seen posted by newbies on AH claiming to invent it themselves. You're using a Kingdrex. And you're using no less than two legendaries with an Eevolution thrown in. An Eevolution you yourself admit is the standard.
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia