Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Citations:targeted killing. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Citations:targeted killing, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Citations:targeted killing in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Citations:targeted killing you have here. The definition of the word
Citations:targeted killing will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Citations:targeted killing, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
targeting and killing by a government or its agents of a civilian or "unlawful combatant"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
|
| ME «
|
15th c.
|
16th c.
|
17th c.
|
18th c.
|
19th c.
|
20th c.
|
21st c.
|
2005, Timothy Shanahan, Philosophy 9/11: Thinking About the War on Terrorism, Open Court Publishing Company, →ISBN, page 191:The moral legitimacy of targeted killing becomes even clearer when compared to the alternative means of fighting terror – that is, the massive invasion of the community that shelters and supports the terrorists in an attempt to catch or kill the terrorists and destory their infrastructure.
2006, Geoff Gilbert, Responding to International Crime, BRILL, →ISBN, page 307:Even if the targeted killing is deemed to fall within the laws of armed conflict, the rules relating thereto protect non-combatants. While civilians cannot be targeted, if they are killed or injured during an attack on a military target, then as long as the means employed were discriminate and proportionate, there is no violation of the laws of armed conflict.
2007, Michael A. Innes, Denial of Sanctuary: Understanding Terrorist Safe Havens, Praeger, →ISBN, page 118:Just what does distinguish lawful targeted killing from unlawful political assassination? The answer turns upon which legal framework applies. During war, the law of armed conflict applies, and targeted killing of individuals is lawful, although killing by treacherous means – through the use of deceit or trickery – is not. In peacetime, any extra-judicial killing by a government agent is lawful only if taken in self-defense or in defense of others.
2008, Mark R. Amstutz, International Ethics: Concepts, Theories, and Cases in Global Politics, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, →ISBN, page 147:In wartime, however, the prohibition against targeted killing is more elusive because the law stipulates that combatants, regardless of their rank or official role, are potential targets. Since war is a contest between states, not persons, the killing in war is not murder.
2009, Benjamin Wittes, Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform, Brookings Institution Press, →ISBN, page 366:The real issue – one emphasized in informal conversations – seems to be that unless the target is a duly designated "combatant," the targeted killing would become an "assassination."
2010, Gary D. Solis, The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War, Cambridge University Press, →ISBN, page 542:There is no announced U.S. policy directive regarding targeted killing. Assassination is addressed in Executive Order 12333, which does not prohibit killing absolutely, but only without presidential approval. Assassination and targeted killing are very different acts, however.