Citations:theology

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Citations:theology. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Citations:theology, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Citations:theology in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Citations:theology you have here. The definition of the word Citations:theology will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofCitations:theology, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

English citations of theology

Noun: "Subjective marginal details" (computing, slang)

1983 1986 1988 1990
ME « 15th c. 16th c. 17th c. 18th c. 19th c. 20th c. 21st c.
  • 1983, Frederick Hayes-Roth, editor, Building expert systems, Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley, →ISBN, page 284:
    [] of personal preference and availability than of clear technical superiority, although discussions among advocates of INTERLISP and MACLISP often take the tone of theological disputes.
  • 1985, Dr. Dobb's Journal, volume 10, Palo Alto, CA: M & T, →ISSN, page 122:
    He does this by showing the correspondence between technologies and philosophical/theological metaphors.
  • 1986, Digital design, volume 16, Boston: Benwill, →ISSN:
    Such machinations produce neat theological arguments but don't help our definitions much. Currently, popular notions of AI range from cute (R2D2) to sinister (HAL in 2001). But real life is far more mundane.
  • 1986 December 9, Jim Seymour, “In plain English”, in PC Mag, volume 5, number 21, Ziff Davis, →ISSN, page 96:
    While those folks are caught up in theological arguments about LISP versus PROLOG, []
  • 1988, Amar Gupta, Bandreddi E. Prasad, editors, Microcomputer-based expert systems, New York: IEEE Press, →ISBN, page 45:
    [] the choice between the available options when both paradigms are appropriate, will become mainly a subjective one, and perhaps more theological than technical.
  • 1990 June 13, Eric S. Raymond, “the JARGON FILE draft, part 4 of 4”, in comp.misc (Usenet), message-ID <1Wm6h5#[email protected]>:
    THEOLOGY [] Technical fine points of an abstruse nature, esp. those where the resolution is of theoretical interest but relatively MARGINAL with respect to actual use of a design or system. Used esp. around software issues with a heavy AI or language design component. Example: the deep- vs. shallow-binding debate in the design of dynamically-scoped LISPS.

Noun: an emotional rather than rational belief or policy