Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
McLuhanism. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
McLuhanism, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
McLuhanism in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
McLuhanism you have here. The definition of the word
McLuhanism will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
McLuhanism, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
English
Etymology
From McLuhan + -ism.
Noun
McLuhanism (uncountable)
- The social ideas of Canadian philosopher Marshall McLuhan (1911–1980).
1967 October, Stuart Awbrey, Paul Reed, “The media missionaries”, in Peace Corps Volunteer, volume V, number 12, Washington, D.C.: The Office of Volunteer Support, Peace Corps, page 8:A basic primer on McLuhanism is now becoming available free of charge to Peace Corps members. Understanding Media, one of McLuhan’s more popular books, is contained in the new booklockers being distributed around the Peace Corps village.
2005, Christopher Horrocks, “Understanding virtuality – links between McLuhan and narratives of new media”, in Gary Genosko, editor, Marshall McLuhan: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory, volume III (Renaissance for a wired world), London, New York, N.Y.: Routledge, →ISBN, part 1 (Rise of the cybernation), page 72:Finally, McLuhanism is ambiguous on the post-modern ‘reversal’ in which reality is construed as a textual, symbolic and absent construction rather than the immediate existence and ‘givenness’ to experience that common sense and empiricism assume is foundational, even if open to debate.
2016, Joost van Loon, “The Subject of Media Studies”, in Markus Spöhrer, Beate Ochsner, editors, Applying the Actor-Network Theory in Media Studies (Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts), IGI Global, →ISBN, section 1 (Introduction and Theoretical Concepts), page 55:However, how can it then be explained that McLuhanism is more often than not interpreted as (or better: confused with) technological determinism by the bulk of those publishing within the mainstream of Media Studies (van Loon, 2008)?
References