MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown you have here. The definition of the word MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofMediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Stupidity

"Stupidity"... Is it really necessary? ZJH 14:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is usually accurate. Except that "user has issues with his own homosexuality" would be even more accurate in a majority of cases. Robert Ullmann 15:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well to suggest that these users are stupid or homosexual is out of line, regardless of the types of edits they make, whether malicious or in good faith. And your block messages could be misinterpreted as personal attacks towards each of these users blocked for "stupidity". And thus, I ask again, is it really necessary? ZJH 17:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'd support the removal of the "stupidity" option. Banning a user for being "stupid"... doesn't exactly give the best of impressions... --Yair rand 07:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Change it to "unacceptable conduct"? - -sche (discuss) 01:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

List of block reasons as of 8 May 2017

  • Abusing multiple accounts
  • Disruptive edits
  • Edit warring
  • Spamming/advertising
  • Unacceptable username