Module talk:zh-glyph/phonetic

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Module talk:zh-glyph/phonetic. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Module talk:zh-glyph/phonetic, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Module talk:zh-glyph/phonetic in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Module talk:zh-glyph/phonetic you have here. The definition of the word Module talk:zh-glyph/phonetic will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofModule talk:zh-glyph/phonetic, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Requesting changes to 啴 and 嘘

@Huhu9001 I would like to make the following changes:

  • Remove 啴
  • Replace 嘘 with 噓

I do not currently have permissions to edit this page so I would really appreciate if you could help me with this. Thanks, ChromeGames (talk) 08:18, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

@ChromeGames: Done. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 10:21, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requesting page move

@Benwing2: I would like to request the page Module:zh/data/och-pron-ZS/刾 be moved to Module:zh/data/och-pron-ZS/㓨, the corresponding traditional Chinese character. I was able to correct the character in this current module thanks to your previous help regarding permissions, but I am not able to edit the actual pronunciation data myself. Thanks, ChromeGames (talk) 01:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@ChromeGames Apologies for the delay. I moved the page; however, the underlying character says it's a variant of ; should the pronunciation data instead be on that latter character, which already has an OCH pronunciation definition here Module:zh/data/och-pron-ZS/刺? Benwing2 (talk) 08:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Benwing2: Thanks! I believe 㓨 is a corrupted form of 刺, so I'm not sure why Zhengzhang only gives it one of the reconstructions--possibly that's just how it's listed in historical dictionaries. That said it's certainly not the only variant character with different old Chinese reconstructions, so if that's something we want to consolidate it probably deserves some more research the verify the consistencies. ChromeGames (talk) 13:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply