Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Algic/nekwet-. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction:Proto-Algic/nekwet-, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction:Proto-Algic/nekwet- in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction:Proto-Algic/nekwet- you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Algic/nekwet- will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction:Proto-Algic/nekwet-, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Jan P. van Ejik[1] noted the similarity of not just Proto-Algic *nekwet-(“one”) and Proto-Salish *nəkʼ-uʼ(“one”), but also Proto-Algonquian*pe·šekwi(“one”) (variant: *pe·yakw) and Proto-Salish*palaʼ(“one”).[2] Ejik speculated that one of the roots may have originally been Salish and borrowed by some varieties of Proto-Algic, while the other may have been originally Algic and borrowed by some varieties of Proto-Salish. (Peter Bakker argues against this.)
In Language in the Americas, Joseph Greenberg proposed a deeper relationship between this word and the Proto-Salish root *nak, *nəkʼ-uʼ,[3] *nəkʼʷ-əʔ,[4] identifying *n(V) as an Amerind numeral prefix. Greenberg's suggestion that Algic, Salish and various other North American language families might descend from a common ancestor has been rejected by many linguists as flawed and unsupported by valid evidence.
Proulx reconstructs this term as nekwet- and notes that several descendants, including Unami, Wiyot, and Yurok, have lost the prefix ne-. Sapir had previously conjectured that the Proto-Algic form lacked ne- and the languages which have it had added it analogically.