Reconstruction:Proto-Georgian-Zan/kor-

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Georgian-Zan/kor-. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction:Proto-Georgian-Zan/kor-, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction:Proto-Georgian-Zan/kor- in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction:Proto-Georgian-Zan/kor- you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Georgian-Zan/kor- will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction:Proto-Georgian-Zan/kor-, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
This Proto-Georgian-Zan entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Georgian-Zan

Noun

*kor- (Čikobava; Klimov; Fähnrich-Sarǯvelaʒe; Fähnrich)[1][2][3][4]

  1. northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis)

Descendants

References

  1. ^ Čikobava, Arnold (1938) Č̣anur-megrul-kartuli šedarebiti leksiḳoni [Laz–Megrel–Georgian Comparative Dictionary] (Works; IV) (in Georgian), Tbilisi: Arnold Chikobava Institute of Linguistics, published 2008, pages 116–117
  2. ^ Klimov, G. A. (1998) Etymological Dictionary of the Kartvelian Languages (Trends in linguistics. Documentation; 16), New York, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pages 218–219, with comparison to Chechen куьйра (küüra, id.), Ingush кер (ker)
  3. ^ Fähnrich, Heinz, Sarǯvelaʒe, Zurab (2000) Kartvelur enata eṭimologiuri leksiḳoni [Etymological Dictionary of the Kartvelian Languages] (in Georgian), 2nd edition, Tbilisi: University Press, pages 496–497
  4. ^ Fähnrich, Heinz (2007) Kartwelisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch [Kartvelian Etymological Dictionary] (Handbuch der Orientalistik; VIII.18) (in German), Leiden, Boston: Brill, pages 469–470

Further reading

  • Gudava, Ṭogo (1960) “O-s u-ši gadasvlis zogierti šemtxveva zanur (megrul-č̣anur) enaši [Some cases of transition of o into u in Zan (Mingrelian-Chan) language]”, in Sakartvelos ssr mecnierebata aḳademiis moambe (in Georgian), volume 25, number 1, Tbilisi, page 119―122
  • Goniašvili, Tinatin (1940) “Leksiḳuri šexvedrebi čačnurisa kartvelur enebtan [The lexical interactions of Chechen with Kartvelian languages]”, in Enis, isṭoriisa da maṭerialuri ḳulṭuris insṭiṭuṭis aḳademiḳos niḳo maris saxelobis moambe (in Georgian), volumes V–VI, Tbilisi, page 618 of 575–632
  • Furnée, Edzard Johan (1979) Vorgriechisch-Kartvelisches: Studien zum ostmediterranen Substrat nebst einem Versuch zu einer neuen pelasgischen Theorie (in German), Editions Peeters, →ISBN, page 40
  • Gamkrelidze, Th. V., Ivanov, V. V. (1995) Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans. A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-Language and Proto-Culture. Part I: The Text (Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs; 80), Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, page 800