Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/wōpijaną

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/wōpijaną. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/wōpijaną, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/wōpijaną in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/wōpijaną you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/wōpijaną will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction:Proto-Germanic/wōpijaną, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
This Proto-Germanic entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Germanic

Etymology

From Proto-Indo-European *weh₂b- (to call, shout, complain). Cognate with Proto-Slavic *vabiti (to lure).

Pronunciation

  • IPA(key): /ˈwɔː.pi.jɑ.nɑ̃/

Verb

*wōpijaną

  1. to cry out, to lament

Inflection

The evolution of this verb's conjugation is unusual and controversial. Unlike usual expectations, it is weak in Gothic and strong class 7 with a reduplicated preterite in Old English. Orel and Ringe disagree on how this situation arose.

  • Orel believes that there were two separate, but related homophonous verbs in Proto-Germanic, with the weak verb being the *-janą derivative of the strong one.
  • Ringe believes that independently, Old Norse and Gothic made the strong verb weak due to analogy.
  • Kroonen makes no comment about this verb's paradigm, and in fact the verb is not mentioned at all in his Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic.
Conjugation of *wōpijaną (strong class 7 j-present)
active voice passive voice
present tense indicative subjunctive imperative indicative subjunctive
1st singular *wōpijō *wōpijaų *wōpijai ?
2nd singular *wōpīsi *wōpijais *wōpī *wōpijasai *wōpijaisau
3rd singular *wōpīþi *wōpijai *wōpijaþau *wōpijaþai *wōpijaiþau
1st dual *wōpijōs *wōpijaiw
2nd dual *wōpijaþiz *wōpijaiþiz *wōpijaþiz
1st plural *wōpijamaz *wōpijaim *wōpijanþai *wōpijainþau
2nd plural *wōpīþ *wōpijaiþ *wōpīþ *wōpijanþai *wōpijainþau
3rd plural *wōpijanþi *wōpijain *wōpijanþau *wōpijanþai *wōpijainþau
past tense indicative subjunctive
1st singular *wewōp *wewōpį̄
2nd singular *wewōft *wewōpīz
3rd singular *wewōp *wewōpī
1st dual *wewōpū *wewōpīw
2nd dual *wewōpudiz *wewōpīdiz
1st plural *wewōpum *wewōpīm
2nd plural *wewōpud *wewōpīd
3rd plural *wewōpun *wewōpīn
present past
participles *wōpijandz *wōpanaz

Descendants

References

  1. ^ Vladimir Orel (2003) “*wōpjanan”, in A Handbook of Germanic Etymology, Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 470
  2. ^ Ringe, Donald (2006) From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (A Linguistic History of English; 1)‎, Oxford: Oxford University Press, →ISBN, page 250:wōp-, wewōp- "It is true that this verb is strong only in (where it often means ‘weep’); both Goth wopjan ‘call’ and œpa ‘cry out’ are class I weak verbs. However, since transfer of a j-present into the first weak class is surely an easily repeatable change, it seems reasonable to reconstruct this as a strong verb for ."