Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrewh₁-. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrewh₁-, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrewh₁- in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrewh₁- you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrewh₁- will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrewh₁-, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Some comments and potential descendants
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I should start with that, in my opinion, the root is a fossilized w-extension of *bʰerH- or ultimately of *bʰer-. If we do not accept this hypothesis, then the relation to *bʰréh₁wr̥(“well, spring”) has no place here.
If we do, then we should add some lateral descendants, even if they do not descend directly form *bʰrewh₁-. In this category fall:
Second, the semantic association with heat and brewing is not the only possible w-extension from the basic form *bʰer(H)-. Semantic nuances related to swelling, breaking,swift motion, buzzing, color association (specifically brown), etc. are also possible. Pokorny, for example, lists 7 different aspects of *bher- (clearly not all of them equivalent to modern *bʰer(H)-). Descendants which belong to this category are:
Sanskritभ्रूण(bhrūṇa, “embryo”) (biological aspect) (IEW links it to the Balto-Slavic entries mentioned above)
I will leave more experienced members (@Victar, @Rua) to decide which of these forms have place in the official thread and which don't. Probably, reconstructing a second meaning besides to brew, boil is necessary. Bezimenen (talk) 14:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
^ De Vaan, Michiel (2008) “ferveō”, in Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 7), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 215