Reconstruction talk:Proto-Semitic/zaman-

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction talk:Proto-Semitic/zaman-. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction talk:Proto-Semitic/zaman-, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction talk:Proto-Semitic/zaman- in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction talk:Proto-Semitic/zaman- you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction talk:Proto-Semitic/zaman- will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction talk:Proto-Semitic/zaman-, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFD discussion: July 2021

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This works as Proto-Iranian better. It has a Indo-European connection and analogy with other words parallelling its shape. And it is spread in the remotest areas of the Iranian language area, appearing native, with semantics fitting Iranian panthea, while the Semitic words are since qway deemed peculiar and probably borrowed. All is argued in Panaino, Antonio (2017) “The Origins of Middle Persian Zamān and Related Words: A Controversial Etymological History”, in Iran & the Caucasus, volume 21, number 2, Leiden: Brill, →DOI, pages 150–195, where page 153 it is also noted: “This situation, notwithstanding the evidence of the sources, is partly due to the distance between the works of the (Indo-) Iranists and those of the Semitists, who seem to ignore each other.” The Wiktionary page was created before this article, probably in consequence of a listing a Proto-Semitic by the Moscow School, that ignores much and of course reconstructs a Proto-Afroasiatic root on thin evidence, just like it reconstructs a word for “big knife” on the basis of the Persian loanword Arabic سِيخ (sīḵ, spit). Fay Freak (talk) 02:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Delete. Definitely a confusing origin, and definitely not PS. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Move: Should be moved to an Imperial Aramaic entry, 𐡆𐡌𐡍 (zmn) or 𐡆𐡌𐡀𐡍 (zmʾn). Also note the entry I created, Reconstruction:Proto-Iranian/ǰámaHnaH. --{{victar|talk}} 03:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Is the relationship between the Aramaic and the Iranian forms known?  --Lambiam 21:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Lambiam: Why don't you look at the article Fay linked above? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 22:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Moved the Proto-Semitic page to Imperial Aramaic and converted all etymologies that used to refer to it. Fay Freak (talk) 12:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply