Talk:נשים

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:נשים. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:נשים, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:נשים in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:נשים you have here. The definition of the word Talk:נשים will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:נשים, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

The following discussion has been moved from the page user talk:Msh210.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

נשים

Latest comment: 17 years ago8 comments4 people in discussion

Are you sure about this? I really could have sworn the construct form was nashot — there's a dorm on the Technion campus that's dedicated to nashot kakh-v'kakh, and an episode of one of the Law and Order series mentioned the phrase nashot khayil as meaning "women of valor" (so, apparently the plural of eshet khayil). —RuakhTALK 02:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just my two cents, I thought that both were valid -- nashot being used far more often than nashim, but still. --75.28.22.235 02:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Oddly, the form given there is neither nashot nor nashim … —RuakhTALK 03:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
See and (where the "intitle" restrictions are to restrict to Hebrew texts (i.e., to exclude the Babylonian Talmud, etc.)). It seems very likely from those pages that n'she is the only form in older Hebrew.—msh210℠ 17:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hmm. Perhaps all these parameters should support a value of usage, that would direct readers to the usage notes section? —RuakhTALK 08:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Or allow multiple pl and cons parameters — e.g., pl and pl2, cons and cons2 — with an explanation parameter; so that pl=foo|plnote=jocular|pl2=bar|pl2note=archaic would yield (plural foo (jocular), bar (archaic)). Or does that make the templates just way too complicated?—msh210℠ 07:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Conceptually, that would be awesome. In practice, the code to do that well would make my head reel. Any simpler thoughts? :-P   (Alternatively, we could make Robert Ullmann do it for us, heh.) —RuakhTALK 08:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
hmmm, think that would be at least a pint. Going to be in Nairobi soon? Need a precise specification. Note that doing it is easy, making in understandable to those who have to use it is not so easy. Robert Ullmann 22:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia