Talk:真実和

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:真実和. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:真実和, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:真実和 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:真実和 you have here. The definition of the word Talk:真実和 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:真実和, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFV discussion: June 2016–March 2017

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


is this true?

真実和

Looking through several Google search result pages, seems to be the only clear usage of this name. —suzukaze (tc) 23:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 12:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

There's a temple by this name, but I can't tell if it has use as a surname... —suzukaze (tc) 23:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 12:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Google finds one 山田 華実子 but seemingly no other people. —suzukaze (tc) 23:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 12:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Google finds many people with this name. Strucksuzukaze (tc) 23:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not a single usage found on Google. —suzukaze (tc) 23:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

According to the Google results someone once wrote a blog post about getting spam from "中山実母沙"; no other usage. —suzukaze (tc) 23:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Appears to be unused. —suzukaze (tc) 09:34, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Google finds usage in only one person's name. —suzukaze (tc) 09:36, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Not a single usage found on Google. —suzukaze (tc) 09:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Google finds usage in only one person's name. —suzukaze (tc) 09:31, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply