Talk:-'d
poetic
Isn't this more poetic than archaic? --Connel MacKenzie 04:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, thus changed. --Keene 21:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
2017 deletion discussion
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This entry overlaps significantly with the suffix section of 'd, though it adds usage notes, its own (lengthy) example use, and the annotation poetic. I propose these two entries be merged. Rriegs (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Should very likely be -'d as it's a suffix. Additionally there could be a ===See also===.
Btw: 's and -'s are inconsequent too: at -'s the head is 's (or properly |head=’s) but the lemma is -'s. -84.161.16.32 19:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- I've moved/merged the past tense suffix to -'d. See also my post in the Tea Room about this. - -sche (discuss) 15:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Resolved, IMO. - -sche (discuss) 19:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Striking as resolved, per the above. bd2412 T 18:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Discussions regarding hyphens
Other talk pages where discussions can be found especially once two ongoing RFC and RFD threads are archived regarding whether or not things similar to this should include hyphens are Talk:-'re/Talk:'re and Talk:-'ve/Talk:'ve; other related entries include -'m/'m, -'s/'s, -'ll/'ll; see also -', '. - -sche (discuss) 09:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
what meaning is used in PO’d? --Backinstadiums (talk) 18:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Is there a variant -'ed too? --Backinstadiums (talk) 18:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)