Talk:100s

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:100s. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:100s, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:100s in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:100s you have here. The definition of the word Talk:100s will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:100s, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFD discussion: November 2019–March 2020

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


"Temperatures ranging from 100 to 109 degrees Fahrenheit." Delete on the grounds that (i) "100s" can refer to any hundred-something values, not just temperature, and not just Fahrenheit temperature; (ii) the 100-109 range isn't even accurate (see high hundreds = "towards 200" not "towards 109"); (iii) furthermore, any round number can take the -s to indicate a range between that round number and the next one of comparable scale (e.g. "the population of this city is in the hundreds of thousands"): it's a general rule of language/grammar more than a lexical item. Equinox 03:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

We have the same temperature-related sense for 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s etc. I'm wondering if the thinking may be that these are idiomatic as they can be used without direct reference to the type of quantity, e.g. "It reached the 90s today", whereas we do not say e.g. "This village is in the hundreds" to refer to population. Whether this is sufficient to justify the entries, I'm not sure. Also, the same argument applies to any individual number in a sensible range, e.g. "It reached 95 today". Mihia (talk) 15:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Delete per nom (the phrase is misdefined) and per Mihia's point that this also applies to the singular numbers like 95. - -sche (discuss) 20:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply