Talk:BJAODN

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:BJAODN. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:BJAODN, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:BJAODN in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:BJAODN you have here. The definition of the word Talk:BJAODN will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:BJAODN, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


As per CFI --Keene 08:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Keep all, as properly tagged. --Connel MacKenzie 08:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Delete as above. This isn't even used in discussion, as far as I'm aware. DAVilla 14:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Keep as tagged, per Visviva. DAVilla 14:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Delete.RuakhTALK 17:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Keep, WMF jargon not unique to Wiktionary. Used heavily (even as a verb) on WP, and I'm fairly sure I've seen it on Commons and Meta as well. -- Visviva 11:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Delete as not independent. JackLumber 21:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
We should really make a note about wikijargon as an exception on WT:CFI once it is established what the actual requirements are. I don't think anyone (besides apparently yourself?) is suggesting that {{wjargon}} is entirely inappropriate here. DAVilla 14:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply