"Coug it" was originally entered in Wikipedia, but was removed as a result of VfD. I have attempted a more neutral, less colorful treatment of the term here. Daniel Luechtefeld
Links cleaned up and appear to be from a single source and author. Is this slang noteworthy? --WRE451 03:48, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The term is widely-used by residents of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. The term was coined by WSU students prior to the early 2000 when they were preforming well, however the term has taken on new life in recent years.
The term is contained in these sources, which per Wiktionary guidelines span over a year. Several are drawn from newspapers:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/moore/93934_drill02.shtml
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/moore/223538_moore10.html
Note that journalist Jim Moore is an alumnus of WSU.
Daniel Luechtefeld 13:53, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
So it probably should be just "Coug". The problem is that these are not "durably archived" AFAICT.
November 23, 2008 - Tacoma News Tribune sports section - HUSKIES COUG IT. Huskies lost the Apple Cup game after having the game sewn up.
http://seattletimes.com/html/seahawks/2019235210_nflpower23.html The Danny O'Neil article uses the term in a context outside of Washington State and not related to the sport of football.
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Links cleaned up and appear to be from a single source and author. Is this slang noteworthy? --WRE451 03:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Links cleaned up and appear to be from a single source and author. Is this slang noteworthy? --WRE451 03:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
There are what look to be three eligible citations on the Talk page. I will format and insert them. DCDuring TALK 20:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)