Talk:Schloss Burg

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:Schloss Burg. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:Schloss Burg, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:Schloss Burg in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:Schloss Burg you have here. The definition of the word Talk:Schloss Burg will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:Schloss Burg, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Schloss Burg

Oh c'mon, this is just the name of a castle. We don't even have Neuschwanstein so why should we have this? -- Liliana 21:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Delete. Equinox 21:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Keep; we do include many place names, and castles are not as numerous as e.g. streets. In any case, I have not seen consensus or any signs of it that names of castles should be excluded. We should have Neuschwanstein, to be sure. Pertinent regulation: WT:CFI#Names of specific entities. For Czech, we should have Hluboká and Karlštejn. I can imagine "Schloss Burg" excluded for its inclusion of the word "Burg", but then you have to consider all the English geographical names like Hudson River, Cooper Creek, Lake Ontario, Atlantic Ocean, Adriatic Sea, Chesapeake Bay, Cape Horn, Mount Everest, Longs Peak, Death Valley, Copper Canyon, Red River Gorge, Mexico City, New York City, Cape Town, and New York State. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
There's really no keep or delete rational here in CFI. CFI passes it back to voters to decide how they want to vote. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Delete.​—msh210 (talk) 04:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deleted.​—msh210 (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply