Talk:Snow Queen
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:Snow Queen. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:Snow Queen, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:Snow Queen in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:Snow Queen you have here. The definition of the word Talk:Snow Queen will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:Snow Queen, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
RFD
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Fairy tale and its character. Essentially a book title, thus not dictionary content despite the translation table. Equinox ◑ 06:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Move to Snow Queen and keep as the character. Translations need to be reviewed. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 10:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- I agree, move to Snow Queen and keep. bd2412 T 14:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. If kept why not move to RFV? Also the title of the book is... The Snow Queen so the move would have to be a split not a move. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:10, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Interesting point. I amend my vote to move to Snow Queen and keep sense 2 (the character) only. bd2412 T 15:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. If kept why not move to RFV? Also the title of the book is... The Snow Queen so the move would have to be a split not a move. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:10, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Moved and kept. bd2412 T 16:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
RFV discussion: September 2015–August 2016
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
This was kept in RFD but it still needs cites meeting WT:FICTION rules. -- Liliana • 09:30, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Added some citations that I think pass (the latter two are not directly related to the Hans Christian Andersen story). Smurrayinchester (talk) 09:48, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- RFV passed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 03:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)