Talk:US-based

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:US-based. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:US-based, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:US-based in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:US-based you have here. The definition of the word Talk:US-based will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:US-based, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFD discussion: August–September 2017

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


SoP, anything can be anything-based. Equinox 19:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Clear SOP. Delete. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 19:17, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Delete (unless a good translation target?) DCDuring (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I don't know if I should vote on this as I created this, but this might end up the same as the #ex-pilot. The reason I added this was spelling. I wanted to look up if the correct spelling would be US based or US-based (or maybe "us based" which also seems to occur but unlikely to be the most common) and ngrams says that changed somewhere around 1980. Also, this was a redlink in based so you just might have to file another dozen deletion requests. More actually, about 72. You want me to generate a list? A redirect would be acceptable as far as I'm concerned by the way, as long as based shows what the correct spelling is. W3ird N3rd (talk) 20:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Because Wiktionary is a descriptive, not an evaluative reference we are NOT a source of information on "correctness". And, the most prescriptive authoritative resource on "Correctness" that I know, Garner's Modern English Usage bases its conclusions on relative frequency of usage in edited works in English worldwide. What really is the alternative source of correctness in language. DCDuring (talk) 19:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Delete. PseudoSkull (talk) 18:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
@PseudoSkull: Honestly, this is just a good way to get your vote miscounted by someone who isn't looking closely enough. I'd strike it out if I were you. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 06:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for changing it. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Keep as single word. Ƿidsiþ 06:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Delete per nom. Or, slightly rephrased, anything can be anywhere based. P Aculeius (talk) 02:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply