Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:Unsupported titles/Square bracketed sic. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:Unsupported titles/Square bracketed sic, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:Unsupported titles/Square bracketed sic in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:Unsupported titles/Square bracketed sic you have here. The definition of the word Talk:Unsupported titles/Square bracketed sic will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:Unsupported titles/Square bracketed sic, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Delete per nom. It's also not correct to treat it as an alternative form of sic since the square-bracketed one can't be used in every situation where the plain form can—which is just a consequence of what square brackets mean. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 15:16, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
If you're saying the version with brackets had a separate meaning, that would be a reason to treat it separately. As is, though, it's probably best to just handle it with a (better) usage note on the main entry. — LlywelynII15:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
It does have a separate meaning since square brackets entail a meaning, i.e. that the text has been inserted into a surrounding quotation by its editor rather than the original author (Unsupported titles/Square brackets sense 1). Hence "" can't be substituted into any of the examples on the sic page that have "quoted sic". This does not, however, deserve a separate entry since it's adequately covered by the square brackets entry. Might be pedantic but clearly it doesn't make sense to treat "" as merely an alternative form of "sic". —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 17:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Delete. This entry seems rather strange to me, it's no more justifiable keeping this than it would be creating round bracketed sic (which I don't propose doing). --Overlordnat1 (talk) 15:35, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
