Talk:WP:AWB

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:WP:AWB. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:WP:AWB, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:WP:AWB in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:WP:AWB you have here. The definition of the word Talk:WP:AWB will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:WP:AWB, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


WP:AWB

Wikipedia-only abbreviated terms --Keene 12:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Um, is this a specific deletion request, or a general one for the pseudo-namespace "WP:" that we have a handful of entries for, for visiting Wikipedian convenience? --Connel MacKenzie 13:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
If we have others like this, then I reckon we could settle for a weak redirect. --Keene 15:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Which is what it is, right? (Or do you want it to just have {{wikipedia}} instead, so it doesn't affect Special:Statistics?) Special:Prefixindex/WP:. Confer: WT:WT#Rogue shortcuts (cross project redirects). --Connel MacKenzie 18:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
The problem is that every time anyone uses AWB on Wiktionary, it leaves behind a notation in the edit history that the edit was made using WP:AWB, which used to lead to lots and lots of redlinks in edit history, which are inherently annoying to Wiktionarians who like to see red links turn blue. Cheers! bd2412 T 11:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I've made it in to a redirect which in turn refers to the corresponding Wikipedia page, which should have sorted out that page. --Keene 08:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply