Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:after. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:after, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:after in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:after you have here. The definition of the word Talk:after will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:after, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Note: The adverb is aft, thus; "The after gun is mounted aft"
I don't think this is an adverb. It tells us nothing of how the gun was mounted but where: towards the after end of the ship or, in the after end of the ship. In these cases it is a preposition.
But in "The dog bounded after", it is used as an adverb, modifying the verb "bounded". However, since "happily ever after" is idiomatic, this probably should not be used as an example. cwbr77 (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Definition needs to be minimized
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In the first definition- subsequently to; following in time; later than, should be changed to- subsequent to; following in time or order. Changing "subsequently" to subsequent, adding or order and truncating, later than. The fifth, sixth and seventh definitions are redundant, merely reiterating the concept of "subsequent to".
The seventh is really redundant. The term "in spite of" is very ambiguous, and virtually slang. Inclusion of this definition is going the way of qualifying any synonymous phrase as a definition.
JustaAverageJoe18:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Seconded
I'd like to reiterate this as having definitions repeated is actually unhelpful, which is not a very good description for a dictionary site. Also, definition 10's only standalone reference (the others being part of definition 3) is actually an idiomatic use, and I don't believe they are valid. cwbr77 (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
(See citation at Crispin.) Is this just preposition sense 1 ("following in time") or is there anything more to be said about this sort of construction? Equinox◑16:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
RFV that sense #6 exists and is not a misworded attempt at #4. It could be completely fine, but at the moment I cannot exactly envisage its being used like this. Mihia (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
FWIW, the 1933 OED has these as separate senses, but with only two cites, only one of them from after 1500; perhaps someone can check whether the modern/online OED keeps them as separate senses (or has any more cites). The old OED has " Following as one follows a leader or guide; in obedience to, in compliance or harmony with, according to a ''law, will, word advice''. Obs. In his Name, beg boldly what we need (After his will). ">…]12.c. In accordance with the statements of; according to (an author). Obs. or ?arch. Oates, after Galen, have like nature as Barlis.", vs "14. After the manner of; in imitation of; like." for "name after". - -sche(discuss)22:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
In the OED version that I see online, the definition that seems to correspond to our #6, as distinct from #4, is "On the authority of, as stated by, according to (an author or text)", which is labelled "Obsolete", the last citation that they have being from 1601, "Anacharsis the Scythian, or after some, Hyperbios the Corinthian, invented the cast of turning the roundell or globe." On this basis, I guess we should pass this and change "dated" to "obsolete". Mihia (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply