Talk:alegge

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:alegge. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:alegge, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:alegge in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:alegge you have here. The definition of the word Talk:alegge will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:alegge, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFV discussion: August 2023–March 2024

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Middle English only? Pinch88 (talk) 23:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Probably, even in the Spenser book (1579 edition) it's glossed. All the other EEBO hits are variant spellings of allege. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 09:08, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

"To lighten, diminish."

Adding this one here since it's also cited to Spenser and a Middle English citation. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 21:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Al-Muqanna: Shouldn't this be rfv-sense? Chuck Entz (talk) 21:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Chuck Entz: It's for an entire etymology, which I've seen the full RFV template used for fairly regularly, but since the etymology has one sense I suppose it doesn't matter, I can swap it. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 21:24, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
You should at least mention that it's only for Etymology 2, so people aren't wondering why this doesn't pass by virtue of clearly widespread use. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Well, have added the gloss at issue in case people were confused. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply