Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:body. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:body, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:body in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:body you have here. The definition of the word Talk:body will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:body, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Can anyone tell me what 'body' means in a feminist context? Here's an example: 'We need the power of modern critical theories of how meanings and bodies get made, not in order to deny meanings and bodies, but in order to build meanings and bodies that have a chance for life.' I have trouble understanding this author anyway, but does body mean anything in particular in a feminist context? 83.83.59.4611:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
I think it just means body (physical torso etc.) but in terms of how it is perceived (by what that kind of writer would call a gaze, e.g. the "male gaze" perceives the female body in certain ways, perhaps as a sex object). So the "making" of a body is the social development of a generally accepted idea of what a body represents. You see the word "race-making" (development of ideas about people of different races) in similar contexts. Equinox◑11:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hair
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
What does "body" mean in the context of hair? For example, hair volumizer adds "body" to hair. Is it the sense "Comparative viscosity, solidity or substance" already in this entry, or something distinct? – Minh Nguyễn💬05:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Looks like a coincidence to me. To start with, the Hebrew is cognate with a different Arabic term, so your two Semitic examples aren't even related to each other. Then there's the fact that the third consonant in Old English is "g". Add to that the lack of contact between Arabs and Old English speakers at that early date, along with the rarity of borrowing of such basic terms in general, and it looks very, very unlikely. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Re: EN verb #6
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Is it not a special case of #5 ("To utterly defeat someone")? Should it be merged into it, and if so how should the templating be changed? Maybe something like:
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence. Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Well, Im the one who added the quote we have there. The webcomic uses it without explanation, and I hadn't seen it before, so I went to the only sense we listed that was related to video games. So I'm pretty sure it exists and should not be deleted, but it's possible that, like bleeder, die, and some other word I can't remember right now, this is a video-game related term whose precise definition might be up for debate, and might vary slightly from one gaming community to another. —Soap—11:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Having looked through Reddit a bit, though, I agree perhaps our sense is too narrow. There's a definite connection with the video game community, and with fighting games specifically, but it looks more to me now that the person who added this may have been a player of one game in particular where it had taken on a narrow meaning, and was unaware of the more general use outside the community. I'd be against folding it into the sense above, though, even if we rewrote it, because murdering someone in real life and beating someone up in a video game are to me two clearly distinct concepts that shouldn't be linked even metaphorically. Perhaps a broader definition such as "to beat up; to defeat overwhelmingly" with a label like fighting games would help, even though that label doesnt have a category of its own. —Soap—13:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I would rather see it retained as an independent sense on its own line. I agree sense 5 likely derives from sense 4, but that's just speculation on our part, and when I was looking up information earlier on pages like this and this people had completely different ideas about where it came from, and none of them mention a direct derivation from the sense of murder. —Soap—12:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply