Talk:bumpfire gunstock

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:bumpfire gunstock. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:bumpfire gunstock, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:bumpfire gunstock in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:bumpfire gunstock you have here. The definition of the word Talk:bumpfire gunstock will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:bumpfire gunstock, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFV discussion: October–November 2017

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


This phrase may be SoP bumpfire + gunstock. Note the creation of bumpfire, and several other related terms, by the same anon. The phrase is also a hotword due the recent mass-shooting in Las Vegas.

If it is durably verifiable, the sense should at least be made less encyclopedic. - Amgine/ t·e 17:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If I'd been able to find more than one News citation that supports this, it might indeed be a hotword.
But bumpfire stock, bump-fire stock, and bump fire stock look attestable on UseNet, with citations going back years. Ergo, not hotwords, though SoP IMO.
OTOH, bumpfire#Verb looks attestable. DCDuring (talk) 13:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 18:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply