Talk:cephalophore

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:cephalophore. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:cephalophore, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:cephalophore in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:cephalophore you have here. The definition of the word Talk:cephalophore will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:cephalophore, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFV discussion: December 2022–February 2023

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

Sense 3: "(obsolete) The family of ventricose and filiform mushrooms." This appears in a couple of glossaries with a more specific gloss (, ) but I can't find any actual uses. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 00:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The "more specific gloss" is actually a different sense: it refers to a specific structure created by some fungi (in the second glossary, ventricose and filiform mushrooms).
Before DNA testing, it was quite common for fungi to be unclassifiable due to not being found at the right life stage for comparison with the same stage of known species. These were called fungi imperfecti. Judging from the first glossary, those that produced a cephalophore were put in the form-based taxon "Cephalosporium" for the purpose of giving them a temporary name until they could be induced to develop to the right stage. This is similar to the practice of placing fossilized organisms that didn't include the structures needed for identification into form taxa.
What's more, I believe "ventricose" and "filiform" are descriptive terms rather than taxonomic ones, though I'm definitely not well-versed in old mushroom terminology. Referring to them as the basis for a "family" has all the marks of a wild guess by someone with no knowledge of the subject. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:51, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
This seems just about citable, as long as the definition is modified to refer to a specific fungal structure instead of a "family" (as Chuck Entz pointed out). E.g., , . 98.170.164.88 04:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

RFV Failed, no results at all for "cephalophore mushroom" etc. Ioaxxere (talk) 07:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia