Talk:chemical database

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:chemical database. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:chemical database, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:chemical database in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:chemical database you have here. The definition of the word Talk:chemical database will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:chemical database, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


chemical database

Moved from WT:RFV to WT:RFD. --Connel MacKenzie 02:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks like a sum of parts Hekaheka 17:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, I suppose that someone might think that if a relational database is built of relations, then a chemical database might be made of chemicals? SemperBlotto 21:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Only a moron.—msh210 12:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Not necessarily. Think of someone discussing the animal brain in comparison to a computer. They might well refer to the brain's memory as a 'chemical database' (actual SOP usage). Of course, a computer's memory is made up of chemicals as well. Moglex 16:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ah, the classic and timeless moron argument. Funny we wouldn't think of computer memory being made up of chemicals. Must be a different sense, one that we seem to be missing. DAVilla 17:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Point of order: Since the use of this term is not being questioned -- and since providing 3 valid cites would not resolve the issue -- this should really be listed on WT:RFD instead. -- Visviva 14:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia's definition is more persuasively non-compositional than ours: "a database specifically designed to store chemical information." So it seems that if I exported Wiktionary's entries for chemical names to a database, this would be a database of chemicals but not a chemical database sensu stricto. I'm not entirely convinced, though. -- Visviva 14:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Nor I. Weak delete. DAVilla 17:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply