Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Talk:copy. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Talk:copy, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Talk:copy in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Talk:copy you have here. The definition of the word
Talk:copy will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Talk:copy, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Add how one is supposed to spell "the document is not copyable with an
ordinary Xerox machine." Jidanni 21:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've added a citation that shows copy as in copy that is used sometimes as a noun. 81.68.255.36 20:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Is this necessary of inferior quality?
I mean, we are used to see copy of rich brand products to a lower quality, but is this a generality?
A not famous brand imitating another not famous brand but with a better material/technology (imitating because they figured out that it is an opportunity or that the product/the design is a good idea), it is not a copy? A famous French movie picturing that is called "La vérité si je mens".
- I agree. I've added "sometimes" as a quick fix. This might actually need merging with sense 1 somehow. Equinox ◑ 19:54, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
- I disagree. Any form of copying is wrong in the absolute. For example, someone is wrong telling God that they are going to copy God, as there is only one God. As such, any copy, immaterial of technology improvement is in the absolute, inferior, and will eventually, for example, fall apart. I suggest someone change the article to reflect a better truth. Jondeanmack (talk) 04:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
The plural of "copy," as in the output of copywriter, is "copy," not "copies." So I think that should be indicated somewhere, but I'm unsure of how to do that properly. This problem might apply to other definitions as well. MaybePotatoes (talk) 16:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply