Talk:desert

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:desert. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:desert, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:desert in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:desert you have here. The definition of the word Talk:desert will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:desert, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

the first DESERT is the one the pronunciation of which I would especially like. I have always heard it pronounced like DESSERT but the accent on the IPA is on the first syllable.

dee-ZERT(s) is what you deserve. DEZZ-ert is dry, arid land. There is also dee-ZERT that means to abandon. —Stephen (Talk) 02:20, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Definition order

The first definition presented appears to be the least common. Not sure what policy is here, but shouldn't the 'deserve/desert' definition be last based on common usage? Also, can a more concise TOC be used, just showing major headings? Not sure what options there are. LaTeeDa (talk) 14:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

We do this sort of thing all the time. I dont like it either but its clearly not an accident. Soap 18:31, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
For an example, see slot. The definition we list first is clearly by far the less common one, and yet it is similar enough to the common meaning that an English learner might be genuinely confused. Soap 00:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sandel quotation

The quote (for desert in the sense of "what is deserved") that's from Sandel's Justice: What's the right thing to do? is more specifically from the section "Justice, telos, and honor" within chapter 8, "Who deserves what? Aristotle"; it appears on p 187 of the NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010 edition (ISBN 978-0-374-53250-5; which is one year newer than the first edition because it's the paperback). I am very inexperienced in Wiktionary, and thus although I hazily perceive that a citation sufficiently informative to help the interested reader find the actual quotation would require Template:RQ:Sandel Justice or similar, and that this in turn would require a template for works by Sandel (which in turn might require yet more), I'm reluctant to attempt to create these (and probably screw up, creating work for other people). -- Hoary (talk) 00:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply