Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:eatin' for two. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:eatin' for two, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:eatin' for two in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:eatin' for two you have here. The definition of the word Talk:eatin' for two will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:eatin' for two, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
RFD
Latest comment: 13 years ago8 comments7 people in discussion
The entry explains that eatin’ for two is an eye dialectal form of eating for two. It might be harmless to have the entry, or even helpful, if a person read eatin’ for two and assumed it (with apostrophe) was a dialectal idiom. It might also be sufficient to have only eatin' → eating, and eating for two. What is the community opinion? I presume the result of this discussion will also be valid for eatin' like a bird. - -sche03:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've heard people refer jokingly to a pregnant woman's "drinking for two", or "sleeping for two": but those are SOP (sleeping for two people) joke take-offs on eating for two. Our entry claims (and I don't know this to be true, but it may well be) that eating for twomeans "pregnant", in which case it's not SOP. (If the entry is mistaken then eating for two merely means "eating for two people", and is SOP and uninclusible.)—msh210℠ (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
I'm having trouble finding a good example in Google Books of "eating for two" being a simple euphemism for pregnancy. Most of them are talking about diet and nutrition specifically, though always during pregnancy.--Prosfilaes02:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Failed RFD. Nobody's dug up any evidence for the pregnancy sense which the creator agrees is required for this entry to be inclusible. Equinox◑22:26, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply