Talk:giuen

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:giuen. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:giuen, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:giuen in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:giuen you have here. The definition of the word Talk:giuen will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:giuen, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Deletion discussion

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


giuen

An insignificant typographical variation. --Romanophile (contributions) 21:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Refer to #auec (to be archived at Talk:auec). —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 23:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Keep, it's attestable Leasnam (talk) 03:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
I feel almost certain that we had a policy somewhere saying that variant letters like this u/v should not get separate entries. Did I dream it? Or is it in a tentative non-official policy? Or...? Equinox 03:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
I'm not aware of such a policy. WT:About Latin says to prefer v in Latin, but practice/precedent has been to keep entries like this as alt-forms, both in English (Talk:vp, Talk:euery) and in Latin (Talk:dies Iouis, Talk:uacuus). The argument for deletion and the argument for keeping seem to be summed up well in this exchange, IMO:

I just reject the idea that vp is an obsolete spelling of up. The spelling is identical, the difference is encoding, not spelling. --Mglovesfun (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
And you don't think it's a problem that the ‘encoding’ happens to be in the form of a different existing letter of the alphabet? Ƿidsiþ 16:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Keep per precedent. Alternation of two separate, still-used letters is not something that can be predicted accurately by human users (especially non-native speakers) or by the site functions we use to software-redirect things like diſtinguiſh. - -sche (discuss) 04:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Keep DCDuring TALK 17:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Kept. bd2412 T 14:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply