Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:gone. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:gone, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:gone in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:gone you have here. The definition of the word Talk:gone will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:gone, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Pronunciation
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
On the pronunciation of "gone", the dictionaries I have with me all indicate the "short o" sound in gone. But here in Australia we always use a longer sound but with the same vowel quality. In my accent/dialect, "gone" and "con" do not rhyme. In SAMPA I would illustrate thus: con: "kQn", gone: "gQ:n"
Can anybody comment on their own accent/dialect please? Hippietrail 11:57, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)
@Hippietrail Sorry for the fifteen year wait. In my dialect (a New England English dialect without the cot-caught merger, but also without the mergers present in Western New England English dialects {I don't speak a Western New England English dialect}), gone is pronounced with the /ɔ/ vowel (as a result of the lot-cloth split), but it seems that in some dialects here in the Northeastern United States, the pronunciation /ɡɒn/ was traditionally used, as in England. This changed into /gɑn/ in New York City: a pronunciation that can still sometimes be heard there. Complicating all of this is the cot-caught merger present in some parts of North America, which has made it not always possible to discern (in those areas) if their /gɑn/ pronunciation came from /ɡɒn/, or was a later shift from /gɔn/.
Regarding Australian English, I have to wonder if the lot-cloth split (which, of course, originally was a sound change involving a lengthening of /ɒ/ to /ɒː/ before voiceless fricatives. That /ɒː/ later shifted to /ɔ/ in some dialects, such as most North American English dialects.) had an impact on gone in Australian English like it did on gone in much of North American English... Hmm... Tharthan (talk) 23:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Lucky I check here for replies every day! (-: Lot and cloth have the same vowel always in Australian English as far as I'm aware so I don't think we have that split, but I'm sure some of the same factors are involved. In AusE there can be up to three short/long vowels pairs I believe and I personally have all of them. "Head" vs "haired", but "bed" actually has the latter, long version. "Bad" and "mad" are long but all other words in -ad are short. I can't think of another besides "gone" that has the long version of that o. Note that all these are more idiosyncratic than regional in Australia. You can't necessarily pick where somebody is from based on which of these pairs they split. It's definitely interesting! — hippietrail (talk) 02:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
"Head" vs. "haired", and "bed" vs. "bared", are exact rhyme pairs in my Australian English (almost 72 years' worth of it, mostly from the three south-eastern states). But is the difference in length solely because we have non-rhotic accents - maybe a way to compensate for the loss of the "r"? Also, "glad" has the long vowel, rhyming with "bad" and "mad", as does "sad". And don't "belong" and "long" rhyme with "gone", all with a long vowel? (But if you have hit "the hippie trail", maybe you are "long gone"!) yoyo (talk) 03:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
In the first sense the thing has finished or passed with time, without anybody's action, while in the second sense somebody must have done something to make the thing "gone". --Duncan MacCall22:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
uneasy
Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
How to add another sense: a noun, with a different etymology
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Another sense of "gone" is as a noun, used in biology, with a different etymology (and probably pronunciation, to rhyme with "go", or with the first syllable of "gonad") - but where do I add it?
Used in this sense in the following paper, available online:
<https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/evo.14306Three sex phenotypes in a haploid algal species give insights into the evolutionary transition to a self-compatible mating system, Takahashi et al (2021)>
We should surely delete the noun sense of gone, as it’s our policy to not include adjectives as nouns without good reason, for example meek isn’t considered to be a noun because of the fact that the meek can mean meek people. Even sick doesn’t have the sense of sick people included among its other noun senses. Overlordnat1 (talk)|19:16, 15 December 2021