Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:hypo-. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:hypo-, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:hypo- in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:hypo- you have here. The definition of the word Talk:hypo- will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:hypo-, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
This means that, while adequate citation may not have been recorded, discussion has concluded that usage is widespread and content is accurate Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so. See Wiktionary’s criteria for inclusion
Latest comment: 16 years ago9 comments5 people in discussion
Two senses particular to chemistry and photography. These senses of the prefix can be verified by adding three derived terms each to the entry (each of which must itself satisfy the CFI). More work needs to be done on this entry (see WT:RFC#hypo). †﴾(u):Raifʻhār(t):Doremítzwr﴿14:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
The photography sense is real and is already listed at hypo. But in hypo, it lists both sodium hyposulfite and sodium thiosulfate (which is what I remember from my chemistry days). While we are on the subject can anyone confirm or refute this, rather than me listing it as a separate entry for now. Thanks--Dmol16:34, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
There is plenty hypo-chemistry. Any salt in which the central atom of the complex anion is in a lower oxidation state than normal can be called that way, but the nomenclature is a bit archaic. hyposulfite and thiosulfate are not the same but they are both pretty good reducing agents. I guess either would do Jcwf01:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Here (at page 69) is IUPAC's characterization of the use of "hypo-". As I read it, Jcwf's statement that it is out of date seems supported. They further say that the term is not used consistently as a prefix to different elements. The reference seems rather useful for us, BTW. DCDuringTALK03:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
This seems like a demonstration of why we should welcome WikiChemipedia when someone is motivated to create it. We don't have the expertise to handle any but the most basic words (which chemical nomenclaturists call "trivial") and those used in literature or the news. Similarly for taxonomic names and WikiSpecies. DCDuringTALK18:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cleanup debate
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Etymology needs Ancient Greek script and antonyms, derived terms, synonyms, and translations all need categorising. The German section also needs a pronunciatory transcription. †﴾(u):Raifʻhār(t):Doremítzwr﴿14:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply