Talk:ice nine fusion

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:ice nine fusion. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:ice nine fusion, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:ice nine fusion in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:ice nine fusion you have here. The definition of the word Talk:ice nine fusion will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:ice nine fusion, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Thanks for cleaning up the page. Will try to find proper references to meet criteria for inclusion.

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


ice nine fusion

Is this salvagable? Also, I note that the "definition" consistently uses a different written form that the entry name. I am thus wondering what the attested written form actually is. --EncycloPetey 02:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't think there is one; Google pulls up no Books, Scholar, Groups, or Web hits for any of the three plausible spellings ("ice 9 fusion", "ice nine fusion", "ice ix fusion"), except for four Wikipedia-descended Web hits. I recommend speedy deletion. —RuakhTALK 03:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
strangelet, yes. ice nine, maybe. ice nine fusion, no. Someone has a bee in his bonnet about this at WP, too. DCDuring TALK 03:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Delete per lack of any CFI-valid cites and discussion at w:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ice-nine_fusion. -- Visviva 04:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
(Corrected link.) Wikipedia has different standards from us. I would cite as ice-nine. DAVilla 13:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well sure, but not in this sense, I assume. -- Visviva 14:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
To elaborate, it doesn't have to be sound physics to be a concept, and it doesn't have to be the most appropriate accepted term to be a headword. If it's citable even in science fiction, then it flies, correctly defined of course. DAVilla 07:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply