Talk:inclusionist

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:inclusionist. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:inclusionist, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:inclusionist in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:inclusionist you have here. The definition of the word Talk:inclusionist will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:inclusionist, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

I'm not sure this word deserves an entry in Wiktionary. Wiki jargon should be separated from normal entries. The same goes for deletionist. Whee 15:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

RFD

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

inclusionist

As per CFI --Keene 08:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Keep all, as properly tagged. --Connel MacKenzie 08:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Keep as a generalized term, and remove the {{wjargon}} context if it can be verified. DAVilla 14:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Keep. It ain't no Wikimedia invention, it actually dates back to late C19. JackLumber 21:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Keep. This and deletionist seem to be the only jargon that applies beyond the wikiverse, though both really don't need much more than a refernce to the base word and suffix -ist.--Halliburton Shill 04:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC).Reply


RFV discussion: January–April 2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

RFV the Wiki-related senses. This passed RFD ten years ago, but this really should have been RFV'd. --WikiTiki89 18:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cited the adjective, but I would RFD it again. Wikipedia didn't invent the word and I don't see the distinction between their use and more general uses. DTLHS (talk) 18:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia