Talk:kime
RE: User_talk:Robbie_SWE#kime.
It's not clear why this user User:Robbie_SWE removed the addition by Special:Contributions/141.213.169.240 that includes the complex-time (kime) definition listed below. There was no justification of this removal other than "leave a message on my talk page".
Kime is a composite noun for complex-time where "complex" refers to the mathematical "complex numbers", as in the field containing numbers , where and are Real numbers and is the imaginary number (). Combined with space, kime leads to a higher-dimensional universe, space-kime (spacekime), with three spatial and two "time-like" (kime) dimensions.
If the community agrees with this inclusion of kime, it should be reinstated.
Thanks. 141.213.169.209 15:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- You added it out of sequence (English comes first) and it had no formatting. SemperBlotto (talk) 16:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Thanks for fixing it! 141.213.169.209 16:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
RFV discussion: March–April 2023
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Definition 2, a misspelling found in a typeset book from 1807. But how do we know it means knife? Even if it does, can we really call this a common misspelling? The author of the book almost certainly did not believe the word "knife" was actually spelled kime .... it seems more likely this is some little-known word borrowed from a language of India, possibly a word that is already in our dictionary but not in the Western alphabet. —Soap— 17:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- The idea of kime being a common misspelling for knife that existed only in the 1800s–1810s strikes me as a bit trollish. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 00:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Actually I see it's discussed at the Wikipedia page for Ghost word, which claims (without citation) that it "turned out that "kimes" was a misprint for "knives", but the word gained currency for some time". The discussion of the kimes affair by Skeat can be read here. There are a few things to note: first, the current citation is incorrect, the passage first appeared in a book review in the Edinburgh Review in 1808 (here) and it was the author himself who confirmed that it was a printing mistake for knives. Second, Skeat does not mention anyone actually using kimes as a word for knives—all that happened was someone thinking that it was a torture device of some sort invented by Indians, and being corrected shortly afterwards. So on that evidence I don't think this is worthy of a dictionary entry. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 00:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
RFV-failed. It doesn't appear that this made it into any dictionaries, so it doesn't go on Appendix:English dictionary-only terms. This, that and the other (talk) 01:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
RFV discussion: April–June 2023
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Only used in papers where Ivo D. Dinov is an author. This, that and the other (talk) 01:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Failed all. Thyself be knowne (talk) 13:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)