Antonym(s): Ghost, Natural, Living, Organic, and Mutable — This unsigned comment was added by 68.253.206.146 (talk) at 13:40, 12 September 2005.
A machine must have rigid moving parts. Some things that are not machines: a hammer, a rope, an airfoil, a barometer, a fountain (sans pump), a loudspeaker (although that's on the border). An atlatl is not a machine either, although the combination of atlatl and spear might be considered a killing machine. Things containing hydrolics are only machines in that they contain rigid parts that the hydrolics move; otherwise they're fountains or irrigation systems or some such.
I understand wanting to call all electronic devices machines, but I don't think they are any more than a hydrolic irrigation system is a machine. In other words, electrons are more like fluids than anything else. Entirely electronic devices -- electronic devices with no moving parts -- are pretty much in their own catagory, they are electronic devices. Most electronic devices, cellphones, computers, etc. have rigid moving parts anyhow. Regardless, electronic devices are only machines in a laxer, and more modern sense. There is a physics definition of simple machine but that's really another definition.
The existing definition is just plain wrong. I propose it be changed back to:
--kop 04:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Nr. | Definition | Note |
---|---|---|
1 | A mechanical or electrical device that performs or assists in the performance of human tasks, or is used for amusement (like a pinball machine). | Current one. |
2 | A mechanical device having rigid moving parts that produces an application of force, usually over a distance, usually to useful effect. | Proposed in the above section |
3 | Any device that transmits or modifies energy. | Given by Wikipedia as the scientific one. |
4 | A device having rigid moving parts that perform or assist in performing some work. | Given by Wikipedia as the one describing the common usage of the word, as opposed to scientific defition. |
I wondered about the current definition, so I collected the above options to choose from. --Daniel Polansky 17:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
The adjective sense is just an attributive use of the noun, so should be deleted, isn't it? --Dan Polansky 22:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from the page WT:FEED.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
An outdated or simply "dated" term used in the US during the 30s and 40s is the word "machine" meaning motor vehicle or car/automobile. Difficult finding this reference anywhere. Ideas? Robert Bushee <email redacted>