Talk:millenuple

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:millenuple. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:millenuple, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:millenuple in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:millenuple you have here. The definition of the word Talk:millenuple will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:millenuple, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFV discussion: August–November 2014

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


All senses (adjective, noun, and verb). There seems to be one citation here, but it's not immediately obvious to me what part of speech is intended.

The one citation I've found is Google Groups but seemingly not Usenet. Some users have been arguing that only Usenet should be considered durably archived, not the rest of Google Groups, but my understanding was that the reason we consider Usenet durably archived is because it's available on Google Groups. So it seems to me that the rest of Google Groups should be considered durably archived by the same logic. —Mr. Granger (talkcontribs) 22:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The reason we consider Usenet durably archived is because messages on Usenet newsgroups are stored on a distributed network of servers from which they are unlikely to disappear, not because "Google has it". Anyway, RFV failed. Keφr 11:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

By the same user. Both of these are by the same user who created giginal and pebinal, above, which were speedied. —Mr. Granger (talkcontribs) 22:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedied per above. Nothing meaningful to be found. Equinox 19:35, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply