Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:minus. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:minus, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:minus in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:minus you have here. The definition of the word Talk:minus will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:minus, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Part of Speech
I've been wondering what part of speech would be correct for the basic use of plus and minus. Here on Wiktionary we have "ditransitive verb", which I'm sure is wrong.
My best guess was either conjunction or preposition. Oddly, dictionary.com lists "plus" as a conjunction and "minus" as a preposition, even though their example sentences are completely equivalent:
Ten minus four is six
Two plus two is four
I think we're both wrong. — Hippietrail 22:42, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The same applies to times and other arithmetic operators. I am not as sure about truly mathematical binary operators, but in ordinary use there is a clear sense that the "minus X" modifies the quantity preceding. BTW, is the corresponding Japanese term considered a conjunction? DCDuringTALK14:53, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Most binary mathematical operators (plus, minus, times, …) indeed behave like prepositions grammatically. Some are even named after prepositions: over (in the sense of divided by), of (function application: "f of x"). I would even go as far as to challenge anyone to come up with another grammatical analysis of mathematical expressions than that the binary operators are in fact prepositions. 130.239.218.8913:09, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Our entries disagree on whether mathematical terms like "plus", "minus", "times" and "over" are prepositions (as argued on Talk:minus and asserted by other dictionaries), or conjunctions. Does anyone want to argue against relabelling them prepositions? @Msh210, as a mathematician and a wiki-lexicographer, what is your view? - -sche(discuss)20:48, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
"Plus" and "minus" can be used without a preceding word, which is not typically a feature of conjunctions. "Times" seems to be more in between, as you can say "fifty times that", where "that" appears to be the head of the phrase rather than "fifty". However, like plus and minus, "times" has started to be used without a preceding word as well. —CodeCat21:02, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Since the basic operations of arithmetic… postdate the Classic Latin Eight Parts of Speech, and since… we're not speaking Latin here, why be surprised if the words for them don't fit the Procrustean Paradigm?
Mathematicians would call them "operators" or "relations", and that's not a bad name. Check out "divided by", a participial phrase, but equivalent to a true preposition, "over". Parts Of Speech are for grade school (if that). Let's not let our zest for the Classics get in the way of numeracy the way the way it has of literacy.
Of course he's a linguist, not a lexicographer, so don't mind his descriptivism. The relevance of his comment to us is in its pointing out the difficulty of categorization; see other posts in that thread for more.
I've relabelled plus a preposition; although one of its senses was "and also", even that does not seem to require being a conjunction, as "besides" and some other terms can be substituted into the usex in its place, (plus|and|besides which) it does seem to be the same POS as the senses before it, which are argued above and on the talk pages and in other dictionaries to be prepositions. The other entries were already labelled prepositions. - -sche(discuss)21:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply