Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Talk:nudiustertian. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Talk:nudiustertian, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Talk:nudiustertian in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Talk:nudiustertian you have here. The definition of the word
Talk:nudiustertian will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Talk:nudiustertian, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Hi, @Mr. Granger. Concerning this edit – is there an exception to CFI for words appearing in the OED? This one does (and is labelled there as a hapax legomenon). I did a search using Quiet Quentin, but all citations are just repetitions of the one already included. — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- No, there's no such exception (we've deleted words appearing in the OED before, such as invision), but fortunately, there are more citations of this word available on Usenet, here and here. Though come to think of it, if people are using it on Usenet, maybe it isn't completely obsolete after all... —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 20:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Hmmm, it's a bit hard to tell from the Usenet quotes what the writers mean by using the word. Should we add those to the entry? — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
many of the quotes are stilted things like "i had it nudiustertian afternoon" and "nudiustertian, Aaron and I went" which indicates people dont understand what part of speech this is. It doesnt mean "the day before yesterday" (for which we have ereyesterday), it means "pertaining to the day before yesterday". This would convert to *I had it of yesterday afternoon. Of yesterday, we went out. (I used yesterday just to make clear that it doesn't work even with more familiar words.) Anyway, I'm not actually sure this would survive an RFV if we went for it, but I haven't looked for more quotes either. Above, we talked about Usenet, but never added the quotes to either this page or the Citations page, so perhaps there are examples of proper usage after all. —Soap— 15:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply