Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:of one's own accord. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:of one's own accord, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:of one's own accord in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:of one's own accord you have here. The definition of the word Talk:of one's own accord will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:of one's own accord, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Move to one's own accord, keeping redirect and adding on one's own accord as redirect. At COCA, not only "of" and "on", but also "by" and "to" appear with " own accord". "Of one's own accord" seems to constitute only about 80% of the usage, not enough IMHO to justify making it the representative of the construction. DCDuringTALK14:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I think moving to one's own accord would be the best course of action. with the redirects. I think lumping these sort of definitions in with their base words would create a larege and bulky "accord" definition. Speednat (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
All that ] needs is a usage example. Wouldn't it be nice if a wiki-search for "of one's/its/their/my/your/our/his/her own accord" actually took a user to the section containing the usage example or, better, highlighted the usage example and positioned the browser window so that the highlighted example was about one inch above the bottom of the window. DCDuringTALK18:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think this is usually used to mean "on one's own initiative" rather than "willingly". I am also very sure that there is usage that is ambiguous wrt. that distinction and rather sure that either is used to refer to the same circumstances. I hope that this is covered by See also mentions. Is a usage note necessary with two definitions? DCDuring (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@DCDuring: sure. I think it's fine to move both voluntarily and willingly to the "See also" section, just as long as we don't have one word listed as a synonym and the other one not similarly listed. What would you propose to say in a usage note? — Sgconlaw (talk) 19:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply