Talk:short-legged

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:short-legged. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:short-legged, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:short-legged in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:short-legged you have here. The definition of the word Talk:short-legged will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:short-legged, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFD discussion: January–February 2018

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This type of compound possessive adjectives is very common in English (cf. CAT:English parasynthetic adjectives) and their meaning is predictable; unless they have acquired a figurative/idiomatic meaning (green-eyed, tight-lipped), I don't see a good reason to keep them.

See Wiktionary:Tea_room/2018/January#broad-winged and the RFD debate of big-dicked for relevant discussions.

--Per utramque cavernam (talk) 01:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Delete. Would open floodgates for "purple-haired", "mild-flavoured" etc. which are all totally transparent, like this one. That's just how hyphens work in English. Equinox 06:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Because it has the secondary meaning of thievish, yes. It would be a bit silly not to include the primary meaning: I could have used the "&lit" I suppose. Do you really want entries for red-haired, yellow-haired, blue-haired, green-haired, long-nailed, short-nailed, long-tailed, short-tailed, two-fingered, three-fingered, four-fingered...? Whom will this serve, apart from some misguided god of "all words in all languages"? You would be the first person to delete an entry like "red hair" or "long fingers", so why does a hyphen make a difference? Please think about this hard. Equinox 05:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Delete for the reason given by Equinox. — SGconlaw (talk) 07:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Delete. I agree with the rationale. -- · (talk) 18:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Given consensus to delete but a previously un-noted WT:COALMINE variation, I have refactored to an "alternative form of" definition and moved the translations to shortlegged. bd2412 T 04:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well closed: should be kept per WT:COALMINE. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:03, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply