Talk:strike

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:strike. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:strike, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:strike in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:strike you have here. The definition of the word Talk:strike will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:strike, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Stricken

Interesting... stricken says it's the past participle of strike, but this page makes no mention of the word. - dcljr 07:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fixed by anon. - dcljr 18:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

The third explanation

The third meaning of this word in English is a transitive verb,but strike in the sample sentence is an intransitive verb,why?

Possible derived terms from Chambers 1908

Ch1908 has these. I suspect most are sums of parts really:

  • strike a tent, to take it down (if anything, should be an extra sense at strike)
  • strike for, to start suddenly for (also SoP? like strike out, start to make one's way?)
  • strike from, to remove with a stroke (also SoP?)
  • strike hands (Biblical), to become surety for anyone
  • strike into, to enter upon suddenly, to break into
  • strike out, to bring into light; to form by sudden effort

Equinox 20:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

second-strike

second-strike (adj): relating to, involving, or intended for use in a retaliatory nuclear attack with weapons designed to survive a first nuclear strike by an enemy
second-strike capabilities
Microsoft® Encarta® 2009

--Backinstadiums (talk) 11:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

To strike work

Is meaning 4.5 independent of meaning 6.3 or did it develop from meaning 6.3? The only quotation we have is only from after meaning 6.3 developed, so it is possible that the author was simply mistaken about the common definition of the term. If so, then meaning 4.5 is an extension of meaning 6.3, so it might be wrong to include it under meaning 4. 157.181.128.176 07:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have moved 4.5 to 6.4. 157.181.128.179 10:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply